Land Property Rights and Agricultural Investment in the Philippines: Experimental Evidence on Impacts and Mechanisms

Publication Details

Author
Snaebjorn Gunnsteinsson and Dodong Gordoncillo
Country
Philippines
Region
East Asia and Pacific (includes South East Asia)
Sector
Agriculture and Rural Development
Subsector
Rural Land Reform
Gender analysis
 
Equity Focus
None specified
Evaluation design
Randomised Control Trials (RCT)
Status
Ongoing 3ie Funded Studies
3ie Funding Window
Open Window Round 4

About this impact evaluation

Property rights over agricultural land in particular are central to policymaking in developing countries given their potentially important role for agricultural productivity and investment, poverty and inequality. Economic theory suggests property rights may operate through several channels to increase investment but despite the importance of this issue, limited empirical evidence exists on either the overall effect or the importance of the particular channels.

Farmers in the Philippines commonly do not have individual property rights over their land but instead hold collective rights with neighbors. The Government of the Philippines recognizes that these collective titles may constrain investment and financial market development and is implementing a programme to subdivide the collective land and formalize the individual property rights, a process referred to as parcelization. This project evaluates the impact of the parcelization programme using a cluster-randomized trial with the goal of understanding the impact of formal property rights on investment and the degree to which the lack of formal rights limits financial market development.

In particular, the evaluation will focus on understanding the constraints to investment in agriculture and the channels - such as access to credit, security of tenure or more efficient land markets -- through which formal property rights may allow for increased investment. The key outcomes of interest are agricultural investment, output and profits; credit use and access to credit; land market efficiency and perceptions of security of property rights.

Scroll to Top