Transparency and Accountability in Natural Resources Evidence Programme

The natural resource governance sector is under-researched and programmes in it are under-evaluated. 3ie supported seven impact evaluations to fill critical knowledge gaps on what works to improve governance in the extractives sector in low- and middle-income countries.

© Nugroho Nurdikiawan Sunjoyo/ WB

3ie-supported studies evaluated different pathways for increasing transparency and accountability in administering and distributing the benefits of natural resources. The commodities include oil, gas and minerals. Decision makers can use the results to inform how they design effective transparency and accountability initiatives and scale up successful ones. The UK Department for International Development and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation have funded this programme.

Event: 3ie and IEG conference on citizen engagement and accountable government

 3ie and World Bank’s Independent Evaluation Group partnered for a day-long event to engage participants in ways that inspire them to make better decisions and ask better questions on the future of citizen engagement and accountable government. In a session on mapping the future, 3ie’s Francis Rathinam presented the key lessons from the transparency and accountability synthesis paper
Read more


For more information, please write to info@3ieimpact.org. To receive alerts about calls for proposals, please sign up here.

Related content

Impacts of key provisions in Ghana’s Petroleum Revenue Management Act

Impact evaluation 3ie 2015

Publication type: 3ie series report
Author: Ishmael Edjekumhene, Maarten Voors, Paivi Lulala, Christa Brunnschweiler, David Valenta
Sector: Environment and Disaster Management, Public Sector Management, Natural Resource Management, Anti-corruption/ Governance

Community monitoring of socio-environmental liabilities with advanced technologies in Ecuador and Peru: Evidence from a randomized control trial using high-frequency data

Impact evaluation 3ie

Publication type: Ongoing 3ie Funded Studies
Author: Lorenzo Pellegrini, Marti Orta-Martinez, Matthias Rieger, Murat Arsel, Natascha Wagner, Ricardo Segovia , Ximena Warnaars
Sector: Natural Resource Management

Behavioural responses to information on contaminated drinking water: randomized evidence from the Ecuadorian Amazon

Impact evaluation 3ie

Publication type: 3ie final grantee report
Author: Lorenzo Pellegrini
Sector: Natural Resource Management

On the mechanics of the political resource curse: information and local elite behaviour in Mozambique

Impact evaluation 3ie

Publication type: 3ie series report
Author: Pedro Vicente, Alex Arm, Antonio Cruz
Sector: Anti-corruption/ Governance, Natural Resource Management

Harnessing transparency initiatives to improve India's environmental clearance process for the mineral mining sector

Impact evaluation 3ie 2018

Publication type: 3ie series report
Author: Rohini Pande, Anant Sudarshan
Sector: Environment and Disaster Management, Natural Resource Management

An impact assessment of stakeholder engagement interventions in Ugandan oil extractives

Impact evaluation 3ie

Publication type: 3ie final grantee report
Author: Eric Coleman, Jacob Manyindo , Rani Parker, Bill Schultz
Sector: Natural Resource Management, Anti-corruption/ Governance

IE70

How should Tanzania use its natural gas? Citizens’ views from a nationwide Deliberative Poll

Impact evaluation 3ie 2018

In 2010, Tanzania discovered natural gas reserves off its southern coast worth roughly 15 times its annual gross domestic product.

Harnessing transparency initiatives to improve India’s environmental clearance process for the mineral mining sector

Harnessing transparency initiatives to improve India’s environmental clearance process for the mineral mining sector

Impact evaluation 3ie 2019
This study evaluated the impact of a set of reforms to the environmental clearance process in India, which included subjecting larger projects to scrutiny from regulators, independent experts and the public.

There are no systematic reviews
There are no evidence gap maps
There are no replication studies