3ie invented evidence gap maps to improve decision-making around where to make investments in producing more evidence or synthesising existing evidence. Since then, we have pioneered further advancements, including developing our interactive online map platform and innovating evidence mapping to broaden its use in development decision-making.
3ie funds and quality assures formative and impact evaluations of development programmes in low- and middle-income countries. These evaluations provide crucial evidence on what works, for whom, why and at what cost. On our website, we host the largest-of-its-kind impact evaluation repository that includes summaries of both 3ie-funded and other studies.
We are global leaders in producing and assuring the quality of theory-based systematic reviewsof the effectiveness of development interventions. 3ie continues to innovate and improve synthesis and systematic review methodologies and the uptake and use of synthesised evidence.
3ie specialises in increasing access to, demand for and use of evidence by governments, parliaments, programme managers, civil society, programme participants and the media. We do this by emphasising the value of planning and engaging with stakeholders to ensure that evaluations and reviews are relevant and useful. We use robust and effective monitoring to measure evidence use so that we can convey evidence impact on programmes and policies with greater confidence.
We set up our replication programme to address the need for a freely available global public good that helps improve the quality and reliability of impact evaluation evidence used for development decision-making. Replication is the most established method of research validation in science, yet it has not been fully embraced by the research community or development donors, leading to this gap.
3ie’s evidence programmes and services help build technical capacity to commission and conduct rigorous evaluations, produce evidence gap maps, conduct evidence synthesis and use evidence. We also work with L&MIC governments to build effective monitoring and evaluation systems. 3ie’s bursary programme supports L&MIC policymakers, programme managers and researchers to participate in specialised training and international events.
3ie has always been strongly committed to research transparency and open access to data. We are proud to be a leader in the growing movement to improve global standards for research transparency.
On request, 3ie provides services to partners for supporting the generation and use of evidence to inform their development policies and programmes. We commission and quality assure evidence gap maps, evaluations and syntheses as well as provide training.
3ie plays a unique role in promoting collaboration among researchers, policymakers and development programme managers at country, regional and global levels. Our global advocacy for evidence-informed action helps ensure decision makers have quality evidence about what works when they need it.
Searching this database will bring up published impact evaluations from our Impact Evaluation Repository as well as completed 3ie-funded impact evaluations.
These provide a visual display of completed and ongoing systematic reviews and impact evaluations in a sector or sub-sector, structured around a framework of interventions and outcomes.
We provide funding for replications, conduct in-house replication research and publish guidance on replication methodology. We also provide funding to original authors of 3ie-funded for preparing their raw datasets.
As part of our mandate as a knowledge producer and translator for our main audiences, we publish a range of knowledge products. These include briefs, impact evaluation reports, systematic review reports and summaries, replication papers, evidence gap map reports, scoping reports and working papers.
3ie’s Registry for International Development Impact Evaluations (RIDIE) aims to enhance the transparency and quality of impact evaluation research before it begins.
3ie’s evidence programmes support studies to fill critical knowledge gaps in a sector, sub-sector or in an area with limited rigorous evidence. We fund studies under a specific theme or which address a particular question or set of questions in programme areas where our donors want to expand global public knowledge of what works and what does not.
To help address gaps in the understanding of what works and what does not, we fund a variety of studies across this programme area, including interventions focused on insurance, extension, land-use and forestry, and innovation and technology.
3ie supports impact evaluations, systematic reviews and evidence gap maps on education effectiveness that help answer the questions of what works, for whom, why and at what cost.
We fund the production of rigorous evidence on biodiversity and forest conservation programmes, environmental regulations, impact of sustainable fuels, climate change mitigation and adaptation.
3ie is supporting the generation of evidence in areas such as transparency and accountability in natural resource governance. We also fund the production of rigorous evidence on interventions to curb corruption, judicial and civil service reforms, land reforms, public financial management, conflict prevention and peacebuilding, decentralised governance and public service delivery.
We fund the production of rigorous evidence on interventions on HIV and AIDS, immunisation maternal and child health, nutrition and sexual and reproductive health through a number of evidence programmes. Evidence products from these programmes include replication studies, evidence gap maps, systematic reviews and impact evaluations.
We are supporting the generation of rigorous evidence in humanitarian contexts on interventions related to water, sanitation and hygiene, food security, multi-sectoral humanitarian programming and interventions targeting malnutrition.
We fund the production of rigorous evidence on the socio-economic and environmental impacts of public transportation by rail, bus and rapid transit systems, and essential services such as electricity and gas to expand access, foster inclusive growth, and combat climate change through sustainable systems.
3ie, in collaboration with India’s rural development ministry is working to generate rigorous evidence on the impact of the National Rural Livelihoods Mission.
We support policy-relevant studies that contribute to improving our understanding of public expenditure trends and improving the delivery of public goods.
We support impact evaluations to build the evidence base on the effectiveness of interventions that reduce the risks faced by the poor through participation in public works and employment programmes.
3ie’s has two major evidence programmes that support the generation and use of high-quality evidence for informing decision-making in the water, sanitation and hygiene sector
.
We work with various departments in the Philippines government to develop and fund rigorous evidence useful for policymakers. We also support capacity-building activities for Philippine researchers and support the impact evaluation management framework of the National Economic and Development Authority.
Working in collaboration with the Office of the Prime Minister, the primary aim is to improve developmental outcomes through evidence-informed decision making in Uganda. 3ie is currently supporting evaluation of government programmes around youth livelihood, family planning, public service delivery and local governance, and universal primary education.
3ie and the government of Benin are working on a a multi-year regional initiative that aims to promote the institutionalization of evaluation in government systems across eight countries in West Africa, including: Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal and Togo.
.
3ie funds internal replications of influential or innovative impact evaluations of financial interventions on mobile money, cash transfers, bank deposits, and other financial service interventions targeted towards underserved and unbanked populations in developing countries.
3ie funds internal replications of influential or innovative impact evaluations of biomedical, behavioural, social, and structural HIV prevention and treatment interventions to improve the evidence base in low- and middle-income countries.
Speaker: Professor Howard White, Former Executive Director, 3ie Year: 2015
By just measuring changes after a project has been implemented, you cannot tell whether the change can be attributed to the project. In this video, Howard White explains why.
Speaker: Annette Brown, Former Deputy Director –Advancement and Impact Evaluation Services, 3ie Year: 2015
In this video, Annette Brown explains how you can create a valid counterfactual using randomised controlled trials and rigorously evaluate programmes. She illustrates how random assignment works in practice.
Speaker: Jyotsna Puri, Former Deputy Executive Director and Head of Evaluation, 3ie Year: 2015
The random assignment of a development programme is not always possible. Jo Puri gives the run down on how quasi-experimental methods can be used to get around the challenge of creating a valid counterfactual.
Speaker: Philip Davies, Former Deputy Director –Synthesis and Reviews, 3ie Year: 2015
Systematic Reviews are essential for presenting the balance of research evidence on a topic. Philip Davies runs you through how a comprehensive systematic review comes together.
Speaker: Howard White, Former Executive Director, 3ie Year: 2015
Although it may be considered a challenge, infrastructure projects can lend themselves to impact evaluation methods. In this video, Howard White takes you through the different evaluation designs that can be used for assessing the impact of infrastructure programmes.
Speaker: Jyotsna Puri, Former Deputy Executive Director and Head of Evaluation, 3ie
Impact evaluations of humanitarian relief programmes are considered particularly challenging because they need to be done quickly and it may be difficult to have a valid counterfactual. Jo Puri uses case studies to show how data and methods can be innovatively used for getting around these challenges and conducting high quality impact evaluations.
Speaker: Shagun Sabarwal, Former Evaluation Specialist, 3ie
Impact evaluations have been used to assess the impact of health programmes on a host of outcomes. In this video, Shagun Sabarwal explains how a mixed-method impact evaluation was used to assess the effectiveness of a programme in Malawi and generate highly policy relevant evidence.
Speaker: Annette Brown, Former Deputy Director –Advancement and Impact Evaluation Services, 3ie
Impact evaluations can be used to answer important development questions related to democracy and governance programmes. Annette Brown illustrates how by providing new examples of different impact evaluation methods in practice.
Speaker: Markus Olapade, Former Evaluation Specialist, 3ie
Agricultural productivity in Africa is low although there are several technologies now available for increasing yields. Markus Olapade demonstrates how an impact evaluation that combines propensity score matching and difference in difference estimation was used to assess the impact of farmer field schools in East Africa.
Speaker: Jyotsna Puri, Former Deputy Executive Director and Head of Evaluation, 3ie
Although the world loses US$3-5 trillion of natural capital every year, there is not a lot of robust evidence on what works in conserving the environment and addressing climate change. In this video, Jo Puri shows how impact evaluations of payment for ecosystem services programme and protected area programmes can answer important development questions.
Speaker: Radhika Menon, Senior Policy, Advocacy and Communication Officer
Many education programmes have helped in increasing the enrolment and attendance of children in schools but there is less evidence on what works in improving learning. In this video, Radhika Menon uses an example from India to show how an impact evaluation can provide rigorous evidence on what works in improving child learning.
Speaker: Heather Lanthorn, Former Evaluation Specialist, 3ie
Conditional cash transfers are one of the most studied programmes in development economics but there is still a lot we need to learn about whether and how they work. In this video, Heather Lanthorn illustrates how an evaluation using regression discontinuity design assesses the impact of a conditional cash transfer programme on educational outcomes in Cambodia.
Impact evaluations can provide practitioners with useful guidance on what an intervention can realistically accomplish. Stuti Tripathi shows how impact evaluations have helped the microfinance sector introspect on where microcredit was falling short in fulfilling its mandate and contributed to innovation in programme design.
Hugh Waddington explains why meta-analysis is one of the most appropriate methods for decision makers to use in policymaking. Meta-analysis is a quantitative statistical analysis of several separate but similar experiments or studies in order to test the pooled data for statistical significance. Using examples from 3ie studies on micro-credit and land reform programmes, Hugh explains how meta-analysis can help investigate a wide variety of questions, as long as there is a reasonable body of primary research studies.
