|
|
© Flickr/katepc's photostream |
Building evidence on the impact of social protection
Cash transfers are estimated to reach between 0.75 and 1 billion people (DFID, 2011). Evidence on the effectiveness of these transfers in increasing school enrolment and health care utilization in Latin America (Gaarder, 2010) has spurred the wide-spread growth of similar programmes across many developing countries.
But there remain many unanswered questions about the impact of such social protection programmes. For instance, we still don’t know whether cash transfers work in weaker administrative environments which typify many African countries. And what are the macro level effects on a country? Do transfers lead to economic growth? The impact of a social protection programme on other outcomes, like HIV/AIDS, is another area where our knowledge is limited. Finally, there is the looming question of whether conditional cash transfers are more cost-effective than unconditional cash transfers.
With support from the UK Department For International Development (DFID), 3ie has awarded US$4.65 million for 10 new studies to investigate these policy relevant questions. For the Social Protection Thematic Window, 3ie and DFID developed a strong shared agenda to fund high quality research that captures the linkages between the 'protection' and the 'promotion' roles of social protection and addresses important gaps in our knowledge. The awarded studies assess the impact of key social protection interventions in countries in Africa, Latin America and Asia. Nine new studies fall into two clusters: cash transfers and public works programmes. A tenth study is an evaluation of a youth apprenticeship programme in Ghana.
Read More...
|
|
 |
Empowering women through Self-help groups
Self-help groups in Andhra Pradesh, India, have a positive impact on the social empowerment and nutritional intake of the participant women as well as non-participating women in the programme area. This positive impact results from the programme's strong focus on social issues (Deininger and Liu, 2009).
Read More...
|
|
 |
Our vision: Improving lives through impact evaluation
Our mission: Increasing development effectiveness through better use of evidence in developing countries
Read More...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Our colleagues at the Overseas Development Institute have written a thought-provoking briefing paper on systematic reviews which offers some insights into the value of this form of analysis, but also finds fault with the approach. In response, 3ie’s systematic review team suggests that just because something is hard doesn’t mean it isn’t worth doing. Both pieces address steps the evaluation community should take to improve the ease and value of doing systematic reviews, including a registry of impact evaluations so that relevant studies are not excluded because of a lack of access to some academic databases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| High-quality impact evaluations measure the net change in outcomes that can be attributed to a specific program. Impact studies help inform policy as to what works, what does not, and why. |
|
|
|
|
|