Humanitarian

3ie supports seven impact evaluations under this programme that provide rigorous evidence to improve the quality of life of people living in fragile and conflict-affected contexts. These impact evaluations examine important questions related to nutrition; food security; resilience; water, sanitation and hygiene; and multi-sectoral humanitarian programming. We expect these studies to answer priority questions on effective and efficient ways to deliver humanitarian programming to improve recovery and build resilience of vulnerable and crises-affected populations.

Sylvain Liechti , UN Photo

As part of this programme, 3ie supports high-quality impact evaluations and systematic reviews to improve evidence on community-driven reconstruction; peace-building programmes; cash-based humanitarian interventions; and water, sanitation and hygiene initiatives, among several others. Funding for this programme is provided by UNOCHA-Common Humanitarian Pooled Fund in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Danida and the World Food Programme.

Why more evidence is needed

UNOCHA predicts that in 2018 over 135 million people globally will need humanitarian assistance and protection. Despite the large number of people in need of assistance, little evidence exists on the effectiveness of aid interventions in challenging humanitarian environments. Two evidence gap maps and a 3ie scoping study highlight the lack of high-quality studies that show the causal relationship between assistance and changes in targeted results.

3ie’s evidence programme

In 2014, 3ie, with the support of UK aid and USAID, launched the humanitarian assistance grant-making programme to increase the stock of high-quality, policy-relevant evidence in the humanitarian sector.

To develop and ensure the relevancy of this programme, 3ie, in collaboration with these donors, hosted a consultative event in 2015 to discuss the scope of the programme and the evidence gaps that exist. At the event, we presented findings from a scoping paper and a methodology working paper that identified innovative methods of measuring impact in humanitarian conditions.

For more information, please write to info@3ieimpact.org. To receive alerts about call for proposals, please sign up here.

Partner with us: humanitarian evidence

Humanitarian-BD-flyer3ie has more than a decade of experience in disaster-stricken, fragile and conflict-affected countries. We welcome collaboration with organisations working to increase the production and use of high-quality evidence and improve how humanitarian assistance is designed and delivered.

Download flyer

Related content

Impact evaluation in the post-disaster setting

Working paper 3ie 2009

Alison Buttenheim synthesises the guiding principles and analytic frameworks for post-disaster impact evaluation, and applies it to a design for the evaluation of relief and recovery programmes fol

Evidence for peacebuilding evidence gap map

Evidence gap map

This map presents existing evidence on the outcomes of peacebuilding interventions in conflict-affected settings in L&MICs. Interventions were mapped in five thematic areas, including legitimate politics, security, justice, economic foundations, and revenues and social services.

View report

Improving the quality of care for children with acute malnutrition in Uganda

Impact evaluation 3ie

Publication type: 3ie series report
Author: Lazzerini Marzia, Humphrey Wanzira, Peter Lochoro, Giovanni Putoto
Sector: Health Nutrition and Population, Child Nutrition

The effects of non-food item vouchers in a humanitarian context: the case of the Rapid Response to Movements of Population program in Congo

Impact evaluation 3ie

Publication type: Ongoing 3ie Funded Studies
Author: John Quattrochi, Ghislain Bisimwa, Peter Van der Windt, Maarten Voors
Sector: Health Nutrition and Population

Synthesis of impact evaluations of the World Food Programme’s nutrition interventions in humanitarian settings in the Sahel

Working paper 3ie 2018

Acute malnutrition in the Sahel region affects an estimated 6 million children under the age of 5, of whom approximately 1.4 million require treatment for severe acute malnutrition.

Impact evaluation of the World Food Programme’s moderate acute malnutrition treatment and prevention programmes in Sudan

Impact evaluation 3ie 2018
Report authors evaluated the effectiveness of a food-based treatment programme and additional supplementary feeding interventions on moderate acute malnutrition incidence and prevalence in children, pregnant and lactating women in Sudan.

There are no impact evaluations
There are no systematic reviews
There are no evidence gap maps
There are no replication studies
There is no related content.