Skip to main content
Subscribe

Home Page Secondary Menu

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • Resources
  • Support Us

Home Page Primary Menu

  • About
    • Team
    • Supporters
    • Members
    • At a glance
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Partners
    • Institutional Policies and Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Services
  • Research
  • Evidence Hub
    • Development Evidence Portal
    • Evidence gap maps
    • Journal of Development Effectiveness
    • Publications
    • Replication Studies
  • Impact

Home Page Primary Menu

  • About
    • Team
    • Supporters
    • Members
    • At a glance
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Partners
    • Institutional Policies and Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Services
  • Research
  • Evidence Hub
    • Development Evidence Portal
    • Evidence gap maps
    • Journal of Development Effectiveness
    • Publications
    • Replication Studies
  • Impact

Home Page Secondary Menu

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • Resources
  • Support Us

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Evidence hub
  3. Publications
  4. Systematic reviews
  5. Incorporating the life-cycle approach into WASH policies and programmes:...
  • Publications
  • Briefs
    • Evidence gap map
    • Evidence use
    • Impact evaluation
    • Learning summary
    • Programme overview
    • Systematic review
    • Replication studies
    • Working paper
    • Other briefs
  • Evidence gap maps
  • Impact evaluations
  • Replication papers
  • Scoping papers
  • Systematic reviews
  • Systematic review summaries
  • Working papers
  • Other evaluations
Incorporating the life cycle approach into WASH policies and programmes: A systematic review

Incorporating the life-cycle approach into WASH policies and programmes: A systematic review

3ie Systematic review 35

Thillai Rajan Annamalai, Sriharini Narayanan, Ganesh Devkar, Venkata Santhosh Kumar, Reeba Devaraj, Akshaya Ayyangar and Ashwin Mahalingam

  • Article

  • Related Content

This systematic review assesses the extent to which WASH policies, programmes and projects in eleven priority countries have been inclusive of different population segments during the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) period. It examines whether life cycle segments (LCS), such as sex, age, gender and disability, and geographic and social segments (GSS), such as urban or rural location or socioeconomic status have been reflected in WASH policies, programmes and projects. The authors find they have increasingly identified LCS and GSS population segments. GSS were more likely to be identified than LCS. A robustness index shows that the identification of barriers, strategies and benefits was more comprehensive for GSS than for LCS. Overall, the evidence showed that policy goals are not always being incorporated into programmes and projects.

Strengthening women’s empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies

Strengthening women’s empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies

Systematic review 3ie 2021
 
The authors of this systematic review assess the effects of gender-specific and transformative interventions on women’s empowerment and gender equality in fragile and conflict-affected states and their contribution to building peaceful and inclusive societies.

Strengthening intergroup social cohesion in fragile situations

Strengthening intergroup social cohesion in fragile situations

Systematic review 3ie 2021
 
In this review, Sonnenfeld and colleagues synthesise evidence on programmes that promote intergroup social cohesion as a means of supporting sustainable peace in fragile communities in low- and middle-income countries.

Effects of access to electricity interventions on socio-economic outcomes in low- and middle- income countries

Effects of access to electricity interventions on socio-economic outcomes in low- and middle- income countries

Systematic review 3ie 2020
 
In this review, Moore and colleagues synthesise available evidence on the effectiveness of electricity interventions on socio-economic outcomes for households, firms and communities in low- and middle- income countries.

Incentives for climate mitigation in the land use sector – the effects of payment for environmental services (PES) on environmental and socio-economic outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a mixed-method systematic review

Incentives for climate mitigation in the land use sector – the effects of payment for environmental services (PES) on environmental and socio-economic outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a mixed-method systematic review

Systematic review 3ie 2019
 
This review by Snilsveit and colleagues examines evidence from 18 economic incentives-based payment for environmental services programmes to understand the effectiveness on environmental and socio-economic outcomes.

SR-43-PITA

Does incorporating participation and accountability improve development outcomes? Meta-analysis and framework synthesis

Systematic review 3ie 2019
 
This systematic review by Waddington, Sonnenfeld and colleagues examined high-quality evidence from 35 citizen engagement programmes in low- and middle-income countries.

    Tools

  • View full report
    EN |
  • Download full report
    EN |
  • View brief
    EN |
  • Print Page
  • Share this page
     
  • DOI : 10.23846/SR81010

Thank you for your interest in this publication

To download and save this document, please fill out this very short form. This will help us understand how our work is being used. We do not share your name or email with anyone.
You only have answer these questions once, provided you continue to use the same browser and don’t clear your cookies
Personal info

Thank you for your interest in this publication

To download and save this document, please fill out this very short form. This will help us understand how our work is being used. We do not share your name or email with anyone.
You only have answer these questions once, provided you continue to use the same browser and don’t clear your cookies
Personal info

About Footer

  • About

Services Footer

  • Services

Our work

  • Research

Evidence hub

  • Evidence Hub

Support Us

  • Support Us

 

Copyright © 2023 International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)| All rights reserved | Terms of use | Privacy policy