Sanitation and Hygiene Evidence Programme

USAID

Globally, more people have access to clean water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) than ever before. But we are still a long way from achieving the Sustainable Development Goal of ensuring the availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.   3ie, in partnership with the Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council (WSSCC), developed this programme to build the evidence base in L&MICs and to support global efforts towards increasing equitable access to and use of WASH services.

3ie and WSSCC’s partnership brought together two organisations committed to closing evidence gaps and improving outcomes for people living in poverty. WSSCC is the only United Nations body devoted solely to the sanitation needs of the most vulnerable and marginalised people. In collaboration with its members in 150 countries, WSSCC advocates for the billions of people worldwide who lack access to sanitation, shares solutions that empower communities and operates the Global Sanitation Fund. Through the 3ie sanitation and hygiene programme, we funded impact evaluations, systematic reviews, an evidence gap map, a study on evaluating advocacy approaches and a midterm review of WSSCC.

To know more about how we are contributing to the WASH sector, download our brochure here.

This programme is now closed. To stay informed on other calls for proposals, sign up for our funding alerts. For more information, please write to info@3ieimpact.org


Related content

Incorporating the life-cycle approach into WASH policies and programmes: A systematic review

Systematic review 3ie 2017
This systematic review assesses the extent to which WASH policies, programmes and projects in eleven priority countries have been inclusive of different population segments during the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) period.

Short-term WASH interventions in emergency responses in low- and middle-income countries

Systematic review summary 3ie 2017

This is a summary report of a full systematic review that synthesised evidence on water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions implemented in the first 12 months of an emergency response.

Identification and measurement of health-related spillovers in impact evaluations

Systematic review summary 3ie 2016
This systematic review summary by Benjamin-Chung and colleagues tries to identify mechanisms that trigger spillover through geographic or social proximity, learning or imitation, norm-shaping, income and substitute effects, general equilibrium effects and relative deprivation.

What factors affect sustained adoption of safe water, hygiene and sanitation technologies?

Systematic review summary 3ie 2015
Safe water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) behaviours, such as treating drinking water, washing hands at key times or using a latrine rather than defecating in open spaces, are cornerstones of building strong, healthy communities and reducing mortality due to diarrhoea and other preventable diseases. Many studies have shown the health benefits of WASH, and factors that affect initial adoption of short-term WASH use. Few have assessed the determinants of long-term, sustained WASH practice.

Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to combat childhood diarrhoea in developing countries

Systematic review 3ie 2009

This systematic review by Hugh Waddington, et al.

Can disgust and shame lead to cleaner water and more handwashing? Impact evidence from Bangladesh

Impact evaluation Brief 3ie 2015
Improvements in water quality, sanitation and hygiene are associated with a reduction in risk of diarrhoea. However, treating water and regular handwashing with soap are not common practices in several low- and middle-income countries, including Bangladesh.

Can disgust and shame lead to cleaner water and more handwashing? Impact evidence from Bangladesh

Impact evaluation Brief 3ie 2015
Improvements in water quality, sanitation and hygiene are associated with a reduction in risk of diarrhoea. However, treating water and regular handwashing with soap are not common practices in several low- and middle-income countries, including Bangladesh.

Incorporating the life-cycle approach into WASH policies and programmes: A systematic review

Systematic review 3ie 2017
This systematic review assesses the extent to which WASH policies, programmes and projects in eleven priority countries have been inclusive of different population segments during the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) period.

Using a life-cycle approach to target WASH policies and programmes in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa

Systematic review Brief 3ie 2018
The brief summarises a systematic review on the effectiveness of two approaches to targeting populations in programmes and policies to reduce barriers to accessing WASH services and strategies during the MDGs.

Handwashing and sanitation behaviour change in WASH interventions

Systematic review Brief 3ie 2017
This brief is based on a systematic review examining which promotional approaches are effective in changing handwashing and sanitation behaviour, and which implementation factors affect the success or failure of such interventions.

Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to combat childhood diarrhoea in developing countries

Systematic review 3ie 2009

This systematic review by Hugh Waddington, et al.

Water, sanitation and hygiene evidence gap map

Evidence gap map

This newly updated map facilitates access to high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of water, sanitation and hygiene promotion for households, communities, school and health facilities in L&MICs. It includes published and unpublished systematic reviews and impact evaluations up to April 2018.

View brief | View video

There are no replication studies
There is no related content.