Skip to main content
Subscribe

Home Page Secondary Menu

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • Resources
  • Support Us

Home Page Primary Menu

  • About
    • Team
    • Supporters
    • Members
    • At a glance
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Partners
    • Institutional Policies and Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Services
  • Research
  • Evidence Hub
    • Development Evidence Portal
    • Evidence gap maps
    • Journal of Development Effectiveness
    • Publications
    • Replication Studies
  • Impact

Home Page Primary Menu

  • About
    • Team
    • Supporters
    • Members
    • At a glance
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Partners
    • Institutional Policies and Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Services
  • Research
  • Evidence Hub
    • Development Evidence Portal
    • Evidence gap maps
    • Journal of Development Effectiveness
    • Publications
    • Replication Studies
  • Impact

Home Page Secondary Menu

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Media
  • Newsletter
  • Resources
  • Support Us

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Evidence hub
  3. Publications
  4. Working papers
  5. Designing impact evaluations: different perspectives
  • Publications
  • Briefs
    • Evidence gap map
    • Evidence use
    • Impact evaluation
    • Learning summary
    • Programme overview
    • Systematic review
    • Replication studies
    • Working paper
    • Other briefs
  • Evidence gap maps
  • Impact evaluations
  • Replication papers
  • Scoping papers
  • Systematic reviews
  • Systematic review summaries
  • Working papers
  • Other evaluations
wp4

Designing impact evaluations: different perspectives

3ie Working Paper 4

Robert Chambers, Dean Karlan, Martin Ravallion and Patricia Rogers

  • Article

  • Related Content

Robert Chambers, Dean Karlan, Martin Ravallion and Patricia Rogers present their views on the evaluation of three interventions – conditional cash transfer, infrastructure, and anti-corruption programme. This was part of the discussions at the 2009 Cairo Conference on ‘Perspectives on Impact Evaluation’ which aimed to work toward a consensus on impact evaluation design.

Download report (Chinese)

Download report (Arabic)

Learning from collective-led sanitation enterprises in urban Odisha, Tamil Nadu and Telangana

Learning from collective-led sanitation enterprises in urban Odisha, Tamil Nadu and Telangana

Working paper 3ie 2022
 
This paper summarizes the findings of a learning study on the processes and lessons from recent efforts of the Odisha, Tamil Nadu and Telangana governments to improve sanitation services and provide employment opportunities to urban collectives through fecal sludge management, and operation and maintenance of community and public toilets.

Use of performance-based contracts for road maintenance projects: a rapid evidence assessment

Use of performance-based contracts for road maintenance projects: a rapid evidence assessment

Working paper 3ie 2022
 
Authors of this rapid evidence assessment synthesize available rigorous impact evaluations of performance-based contracting in road construction in low income and low-and-middle-income countries. 

Evaluation of IDEA project in Bangladesh: a baseline report

Evaluation of IDEA project in Bangladesh: a baseline report

Working paper 3ie 2022
 
Authors of this report present the findings from a baseline survey of a WorldFish aquaculture project, Increasing income, diversifying diets and empowering women (IDEA) in Bangladesh. This baseline report is part of an ongoing impact evaluation of the project that focuses on the Rajshahi and Rangpur divisions.

Working Paper 52, 2022

A framework for examining women’s economic empowerment in collective enterprises

Working paper 3ie 2022
 
Women-owned collective enterprises are seen as vehicles for promoting economic empowerment. To assess how collective enterprise-based interventions can lead to empowerment, it's important to understand the pathways to change.

Understanding caste-based differences in self help groups: Evidence from India’s NRLM program

Understanding caste-based differences in self help groups: Evidence from India’s NRLM program

Working paper 3ie 2022
 
Authors of this paper analyze the caste-based differences in office bearer positions, participation and benefits received by women who are members of self-help groups under India’s National Rural Livelihoods Mission.

    Tools

  • View paper
    EN| FR| SP|
  • Download paper
    EN | FR | SP |
  • Print Page
  • Share this page
     

Thank you for your interest in this publication

To download and save this document, please fill out this very short form. This will help us understand how our work is being used. We do not share your name or email with anyone.
You only have answer these questions once, provided you continue to use the same browser and don’t clear your cookies
Personal info

Thank you for your interest in this publication

To download and save this document, please fill out this very short form. This will help us understand how our work is being used. We do not share your name or email with anyone.
You only have answer these questions once, provided you continue to use the same browser and don’t clear your cookies
Personal info

Thank you for your interest in this publication

To download and save this document, please fill out this very short form. This will help us understand how our work is being used. We do not share your name or email with anyone.
You only have answer these questions once, provided you continue to use the same browser and don’t clear your cookies
Personal info

About Footer

  • About

Services Footer

  • Services

Our work

  • Research

Evidence hub

  • Evidence Hub

Support Us

  • Support Us

 

Copyright © 2023 International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)| All rights reserved | Terms of use | Privacy policy